The Role of Religon In Diplomacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The Role of Religon In Diplomacy - quiz ExampleReligious leading can understand the causes of conflicts more clearly than politicians. Religions work on the principles of ethics whereas politics work on the principle of utility. In other words, politics always try to accomplishment as much as from a negotiation whereas religions may give more importance to the subsidence of disputes even if it sacrifice something. So, culturally motivated politics can be settled more efficaciously with the answer of religions or spectral leaders since the dialogues betwixt religious leaders may help some(prenominal) the parties to realize the issue more deeply. At the same time it is difficult to solve all outside(a) disputes with the help of faith or religious leaders. There atomic number 18 many conflicts in which both the parties happens to be from the same religion. It should be noted that Iran and Iraq have engaged in a fierce battle fewer years before even though both the countries are dominated by Muslim religion. The deflect of religion in Iranian politics was more than that in Iraq few years before. Even though Muslim leaders tried to solve Iran-Iraq conflicts amicably, Saddams dictatorship prevented them from doing so. Nobody can suggest that Hitler like dictators will even hear the words of religious leaders. In short, settling cultural disputes between countries with the help of faith based diplomacy is difficult in some cases as cited in the higher up examples. Majority of the religions teach the importance of love in answer problems between people and cultures. Religious leaders should teach diplomats and politicians the necessities of solving cultural disputes based on example and values rather than selfishness. In the reliable globalized world, religious leaders can play more serviceable roles in solving cultural problems. For example, Pope... This reputation approves that it is difficult to solve all international disputes with the help of faith or religious leaders. There are many conflicts in which both the parties happens to be from the same religion. It should be noted that Iran and Iraq have engaged in a fierce battle few years before even though both the countries are dominated by Muslim religion. The influence of religion in Iranian politics was more than that in Iraq few years before. Even though Muslim leaders tried to solve Iran-Iraq conflicts amicably, Saddams dictatorship prevented them from doing so. Nobody can argue that Hitler like dictators will even hear the words of religious leaders. In short, settling cultural disputes between countries with the help of faith based diplomacy is difficult in some cases as cited in the above examples. Majority of the religions teach the importance of love in solving problems between people and cultures. Religious leaders should teach diplomats and politicians the necessities of solving cultural disputes based on moral and values rather than selfishness. In the curre nt globalized world, religious leaders can play more useful roles in solving cultural problems. This report makes a conclusion that faith based diplomacy is of the essence(p) in solving some of the culturally motivated disputers in this world. Albrights opinions are extremely germane(predicate) and logical when we analyze some of the cultural conflicts existing in this world. Faith based diplomacy with the help of morals and values will be more effective than political diplomacy.