Friday, July 26, 2019
SPSS Analsis for Corporate social performance and results description Assignment - 1
SPSS Analsis for Corporate social performance and results description - Assignment Example We can conclude that the differences between condition Means are likely due to chance and not likely due to the independent variable manipulation. We now check for significance difference in the mean social disclosure between the two groups (B2C and B2B). From the table below, the p-value for Laveneââ¬â¢s test is 0.163 (a value greater than 5% significance level, this means that the variability in the two conditions is about the same we therefore assume equal variances and use the p-value assuming equal variances. The p-value is 0.064 (a value greater than 5% significance level), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no statistically significant difference between the two conditions (B2C and B2B). We can conclude that the differences between condition Means (for the employee turnover %) are likely due to chance and not likely due to the independent variable manipulation. We now check for significance difference in the mean social disclosure between the two groups (B2C and B2B). From the table below, the p-value for Laveneââ¬â¢s test is 0.026 (a value less than 5% significance level, this means that the variability in the two conditions is different we therefore assume unequal variances and use the p-value assuming equal variances. The p-value is 0.332 (a value greater than 5% significance level), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no statistically significant difference between the two conditions (B2C and B2B). We can conclude that the differences between condition Means (for the community spend) are likely due to chance and not likely due to the independent variable manipulation. We now check for significance difference in the mean social disclosure between the two groups (B2C and B2B). From the table below, the p-value for Laveneââ¬â¢s test is 0.578 (a value greater than 5% significance level, this means that the variability in the two conditions is about the same we therefore assume
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.